The Porch hits the rollers
Not too bad...
-
Group:
Premium Member
-
Posts:
9,248
-
Joined:
11-November 03
-
Gender:Male
-
Location:Nuke City
-
Interests:STREET RACING!!
-
-
Posted 27 March 2008 - 02:26 PM
Not what i hoped (it never is!), but not too bad! HUGE thanks to: Eric (sq_creations) for helping to get the car dialed in (it was a quick and dirty job, but it runs great now!) -and- Courtney and Al @ Flash Automotive for the use of their dyno and patience!   and the results....  Land & Sea DynoMite (don't know anything else about it) Peak Horsepower: Actual: 243.6 Corrected: 344 @ 5750 Average Horsepower: 184 / 250 (corrected) Peak Torque: Actual: 250 Corrected: 344 @ 4900 Average Torque: 239 / 322 (corrected) from 2150-5950rpms For a 2800lb car, it's enough to get me in trouble  The peak numbers are less than i was hoping, but both curves are beautiful, and the torque curve makes the car a blast to drive!
~Chris
-1990 Porsche 944 S2. Mild LS1 swap, AOR Trans
-1993 Jeep Cherokee (3" Lift, 30" tires)
0
-
Group:
Premium Member
-
Posts:
1,515
-
Joined:
24-September 03
-
Gender:Male
-
Location:Albuquerque, NM
-
-
Posted 27 March 2008 - 02:31 PM
Kinda low for a cammed LS1, I would've expected near 380whp at least. Do you still have the stock manifolds, or headers? FYI, stock rev limit is 6200. I forget your cam specs, but It probably would've made more power if you stayed in it a little longer. If the valvetrain supports it (new springs/pushrods), rev it to at least 6500-6600, and see how it does. At the same time, I know that's a load bearing dyno, so it might dyno lower than a dynojet dyno would.  Anyway, congrats on getting it altogether, I bet it feels awesome in that little car. Any plans on going to the drag strip with it?
This post has been edited by Muerte_X: 27 March 2008 - 02:35 PM
Philip
1998 Camaro B4C
lid, exhaust, Custom Torque Converter by Gary Gonzales :)
300whp/312tq SAE
13.02@104 w/1.76 60ft @ 7000ft
VTEC, all of the lag and none of the turbo. It's like waiting for bad sex.
Ezekiel 23:20
0
-
Group:
Premium Member
-
Posts:
9,248
-
Joined:
11-November 03
-
Gender:Male
-
Location:Nuke City
-
Interests:STREET RACING!!
-
-
Posted 27 March 2008 - 02:39 PM
Kinda low for a cammed LS1, do you still have the stock manifolds, or headers? FYI, stock rev limit is 6200. I forget your cam specs, but It probably would've made more power if you stayed in it a little longer. If the valvetrain supports it (new springs/pushrods), rev it to at least 6500-6600, and see how it does. At the same time, I know that's a load bearing dyno, so it might dyno lower than a dynojet dyno would. Anyway, congrats on getting it altogether, I bet it feels awesome in that little car. Any plans on going to the drag strip with it? I thought so too, but i don't really know the differences between different dynos. The power dropped off significantly after about 5900 so i just took my foot out of it. The car's got full exhaust (1 & 3/4 mid-length headers) and upgraded valve springs. The cam i picked is mainly for torque since i'll be doing autocrossing and stuff like that. I also think my air intake is probably hurting the horsepower a bit (3" mandrel with several good bends in it). I'll try and get it out to the strip one of these days! These cars (944's) suck at drag racing though...tons of wheel-hop, and the transmission is always a weak point.
~Chris
-1990 Porsche 944 S2. Mild LS1 swap, AOR Trans
-1993 Jeep Cherokee (3" Lift, 30" tires)
0
 - "The strong shall stand, the weak will fall by the wayside.
-
-
Group:
Legacy Supporting Member
-
Posts:
1,488
-
Joined:
14-December 05
-
Location:Robins AFB, GA
-
Interests:Racing, going out, meeting new people, and working on cars. Doing the governments dirty work as part of the military.
-
Posted 27 March 2008 - 02:43 PM
Kinda low for a cammed LS1, I would've expected near 380whp at least. Do you still have the stock manifolds, or headers? FYI, stock rev limit is 6200. I forget your cam specs, but It probably would've made more power if you stayed in it a little longer. If the valvetrain supports it (new springs/pushrods), rev it to at least 6500-6600, and see how it does. At the same time, I know that's a load bearing dyno, so it might dyno lower than a dynojet dyno would. Anyway, congrats on getting it altogether, I bet it feels awesome in that little car. Any plans on going to the drag strip with it? +1, you weren't going to get anymore torque but you shut down way too early I think. 344whp is not bad though but I could easily see ~365whp if you would've stayed in it for another ~600-700 rpms ... Still slow though, 
Recon Observe Mark And Destroy
0
-
Group:
Admin
-
Posts:
11,570
-
Joined:
12-August 03
-
Gender:Male
-
Location:NM
-
-
Posted 27 March 2008 - 02:52 PM
damn.. car looks good man!
that was a pretty fast build!
0
-
Group:
Legacy Supporting Member
-
Posts:
1,406
-
Joined:
05-January 07
-
Gender:Male
-
Location:Sheridan N.M.
-
Interests:I'm not interested in anything...
-
-
Posted 27 March 2008 - 02:56 PM
+1
0
-
Group:
Vendor
-
Posts:
3,255
-
Joined:
02-June 04
-
Gender:Male
-
Location:Albuquerque, NM
-
Interests:Tuning Your Car, Drag Racing, Car Audio, Sky Diving, Skiing, Building stuff!!
-
-
Posted 27 March 2008 - 03:03 PM
We were short on time. I think we only got 5 or 6 pulls in. The car was running rich to begin with but is much better now. Id still love to get some more time on the laptop if we can get it from Cortney some time. How is it running on the street?
~Eric
0
-
Group:
Premium Member
-
Posts:
3,803
-
Joined:
28-May 04
-
Location:Hepcat City
-
-
Posted 27 March 2008 - 03:06 PM
excellent...
that is 'HepKitty approved'..
Sweet Maybellene..
0
-
Group:
Legacy Supporting Member
-
Posts:
3,545
-
Joined:
29-November 03
-
Gender:Not Telling
-
-
Posted 27 March 2008 - 03:07 PM
Damn, those are some nice numbers!!
0
-
Group:
Members
-
Posts:
483
-
Joined:
13-March 08
Posted 27 March 2008 - 03:13 PM
i like trick motor swaps  nice car man 
0
-
Group:
Members
-
Posts:
1,726
-
Joined:
31-August 05
-
Gender:Male
-
Location:Roswell
-
Interests:Hondas. Going Fast. Softball. Selling Houses!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
-
Posted 27 March 2008 - 03:22 PM
put it on a dyno jet and you will see another 10 to 20 whp .
i dont think its too bad for a quick tune.. i bet with a little more time on the dyno you would see some better numbers..
and take it to 6,300ish you will see a little more..
nice job eric...
92 honda hatch stock b16 15psi 11.9@129mph New setup still in progress(dont know that i will ever get around to it....
93 integra stock b16 12psi 12.5@122mph
93 honda hatch k20swaped 13.4@104mph Sold
2003 Duramax 5 inch PPE intake Autometer boost and pyro gauges(daily Driver)Cause its Great on Gas<< LOL
2003 suburban (wifes Truck)K&n drop in
93 dogde dakota (work truck)
1989 240sx RB swapped :)
0
-
Group:
Legacy Supporting Member
-
Posts:
10,004
-
Joined:
02-January 04
-
Gender:Male
-
-
Posted 27 March 2008 - 03:39 PM
can I hump it just for 10-15 mins?
Metal Snob V1.0
Jerry,Nate and Mains ThreadJacking Inc.
Quote by KingNate
Quote yeah all the passion is gone rippin newbies was like banging some gorgeous chick. now you're married to her, she smells funny and got really fat in all the wrong places
0
-
Group:
Premium Member
-
Posts:
643
-
Joined:
20-September 03
-
Location:Albuquerque
-
Posted 27 March 2008 - 03:44 PM
That sure was a fast build, great to see you have it up and running. As for dyno numbers....... it's all about how it drives on the street/track  you wanted torque and you have it. Nice job on the build.
0
-
Group:
Members
-
Posts:
1,519
-
Joined:
29-September 06
-
Location:NW ABQ
-
Posted 27 March 2008 - 03:49 PM
I believe those dynos read a little low. Where is that dyno? Great #'s for a car that weighs that little. I bet it moves.
2006 WRX Wagon
675whp/586wtq, daily driven
0
1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
|
|
Sign In
Register
Help
MultiQuote
